| Title |
Dietary advice given by a dietitian versus other health professional or self-help resources to reduce blood cholesterol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001366 |
| Authors |
Rachel L Thompson, Carolyn D Summerbell, Lee Hooper, Julian PT Higgins, Paul Little, Diane Talbot, Shah Ebrahim |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 2 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 211 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 21% |
| Unknown | 51 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 61 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,758,286
of 23,802,862 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,609
of 12,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,474
of 50,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,802,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.