↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Dietary advice given by a dietitian versus other health professional or self-help resources to reduce blood cholesterol

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Dietary advice given by a dietitian versus other health professional or self-help resources to reduce blood cholesterol
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001366
Authors

Rachel L Thompson, Carolyn D Summerbell, Lee Hooper, Julian PT Higgins, Paul Little, Diane Talbot, Shah Ebrahim

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
United States 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 179 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Master 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 40 21%
Unknown 29 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 14%
Social Sciences 19 10%
Psychology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 38 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2015.
All research outputs
#5,269,248
of 18,787,703 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,599
of 11,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,328
of 283,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#105
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,787,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.