The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009857.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tina Poklepovic, Helen V Worthington, Trevor M Johnson, Dario Sambunjak, Pauline Imai, Jan E Clarkson, Peter Tugwell |
| Abstract |
Effective oral hygiene is a crucial factor in maintaining good oral health, which is associated with overall health and health-related quality of life. Dental floss has been used for many years in conjunction with toothbrushing for removing dental plaque in between teeth, however, interdental brushes have been developed which many people find easier to use than floss, providing there is sufficient space between the teeth. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 18% |
| Spain | 5 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 29% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 317 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 59 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 17% |
| Unknown | 85 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 184 | 56% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Unknown | 85 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#476,205
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#795
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,385
of 324,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.