↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chlorpromazine versus placebo for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
Title
Chlorpromazine versus placebo for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000284.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clive E Adams, George A Awad, John Rathbone, Ben Thornley, Karla Soares-Weiser

Abstract

Chlorpromazine, formulated in the 1950s, remains a benchmark treatment for people with schizophrenia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 318 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 19%
Researcher 44 14%
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Other 58 18%
Unknown 51 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 31%
Psychology 60 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 9%
Social Sciences 21 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 5%
Other 43 13%
Unknown 55 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#952,676
of 19,462,049 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,338
of 11,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,590
of 288,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,462,049 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.