↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004997.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Jahn, Katrin Beutner, Gero Langer

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 165 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 15 9%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 50 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 53 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,280,901
of 23,706,059 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,157
of 12,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,083
of 177,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.