↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004997.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Jahn, Katrin Beutner, Gero Langer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 15 9%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 41 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 44 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,462,334
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,302
of 12,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,681
of 176,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.