↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long‐term bladder drainage in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long‐term bladder drainage in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004997.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Jahn, Katrin Beutner, Gero Langer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 186 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 16 8%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 65 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 70 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,905,222
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,040
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,118
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.