| Title |
Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004997.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick Jahn, Katrin Beutner, Gero Langer |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 165 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 50 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 53 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,280,901
of 23,706,059 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,157
of 12,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,083
of 177,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#150
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.