↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Types of indwelling urinary catheters for long-term bladder drainage in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004997.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Jahn, Katrin Beutner, Gero Langer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 130 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 13 10%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 31 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#9,387,806
of 17,764,497 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,949
of 11,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,620
of 277,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#205
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,764,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.