↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
394 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
699 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007470.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Goran Bjelakovic, Lise Lotte Gluud, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Kate Whitfield, Jørn Wetterslev, Rosa G Simonetti, Marija Bjelakovic, Christian Gluud

Abstract

Available evidence on the effects of vitamin D on mortality has been inconclusive. In a recent systematic review, we found evidence that vitamin D3 may decrease mortality in mostly elderly women. The present systematic review updates and reassesses the benefits and harms of vitamin D supplementation used in primary and secondary prophylaxis of mortality.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 699 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 692 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 113 16%
Student > Bachelor 90 13%
Researcher 83 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 9%
Student > Postgraduate 42 6%
Other 136 19%
Unknown 174 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 258 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 67 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 3%
Other 84 12%
Unknown 213 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 362. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2023.
All research outputs
#79,305
of 23,891,012 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#149
of 12,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#687
of 310,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,891,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.