The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002006.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Janesh K Gupta, Akanksha Sood, G Justus Hofmeyr, Joshua P Vogel |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 8% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 657 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 655 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 97 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 75 | 11% |
| Researcher | 49 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 104 | 16% |
| Unknown | 261 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 148 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 34 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 46 | 7% |
| Unknown | 280 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 207. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#203,558
of 26,626,316 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#333
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,019
of 332,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.