↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravascular brachytherapy for peripheral vascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Intravascular brachytherapy for peripheral vascular disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003504.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alina Andras, Monica Hansrani, Marlene Stewart, Gerard Stansby

Abstract

Interventional treatment of arteries that are narrowed and obstructed by atherosclerosis involves either bypassing the blockage using a graft; widening the artery from the inside with a balloon, a procedure known as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA); or providing a strut to hold the vessel open, known as a stent. All of these treatments are, however, limited by the high numbers that fail within a year. Intravascular brachytherapy is the application of radiation directly to the site of vessel narrowing. It is known to inhibit the processes that lead to restenosis (narrowing) of vessels and grafts after treatment. This is an update of a review first published in 2002.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 30%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 34 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,797,842
of 17,464,602 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,238
of 11,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,260
of 263,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,464,602 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.