↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
274 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
Title
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004178.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharath Chandra Vikram Paravastu, Rubaraj Jayarajasingam, Rachel Cottam, Simon J Palfreyman, Jonathan A Michaels, Steven M Thomas

Abstract

An abnormal dilatation of the abdominal aorta is referred to as an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Due to the risk of rupture, surgical repair is offered electively to individuals with aneurysms greater than 5.5 cm in size. Traditionally, conventional open surgical repair (OSR) was considered the first choice approach. However, over the past two decades endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has gained popularity as a treatment option. This article intends to review the role of EVAR in the management of elective AAA.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 303 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 14%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Master 40 13%
Other 29 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Other 66 21%
Unknown 64 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 166 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 6%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 76 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,503,349
of 21,899,651 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,129
of 12,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,199
of 290,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#81
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,899,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.