↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
16 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
304 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
Title
Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004178.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sharath Chandra Vikram Paravastu, Rubaraj Jayarajasingam, Rachel Cottam, Simon J Palfreyman, Jonathan A Michaels, Steven M Thomas

Abstract

An abnormal dilatation of the abdominal aorta is referred to as an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Due to the risk of rupture, surgical repair is offered electively to individuals with aneurysms greater than 5.5 cm in size. Traditionally, conventional open surgical repair (OSR) was considered the first choice approach. However, over the past two decades endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has gained popularity as a treatment option. This article intends to review the role of EVAR in the management of elective AAA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 345 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 14%
Student > Master 44 13%
Researcher 43 12%
Other 30 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 8%
Other 67 19%
Unknown 90 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 175 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Social Sciences 10 3%
Engineering 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 30 9%
Unknown 101 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,837,230
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,916
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,608
of 321,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.