| Title |
Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010108.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne Guay, Peter Choi, Santhanam Suresh, Natalie Albert, Sandra Kopp, Nathan Leon Pace |
| Abstract |
Various beneficial effects derived from neuraxial blocks have been reported. However, it is unclear whether these effects have an influence on perioperative mortality and major pulmonary/cardiovascular complications. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Guatemala | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 388 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 57 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 12% |
| Researcher | 36 | 9% |
| Other | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 9% |
| Other | 96 | 24% |
| Unknown | 93 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 219 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Unknown | 112 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,685,666
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,059
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,697
of 306,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#151
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.