↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anaesthetic regimens for day-procedure laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
Title
Anaesthetic regimens for day-procedure laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009784.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Vaughan, Myura Nagendran, Jacqueline Cooper, Brian R Davidson, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

Abstract

Day surgery involves admission of selected patients to hospital for a planned surgical procedure with the patients returning home on the same day. An anaesthetic regimen usually involves a combination of an anxiolytic, an induction agent, a maintenance agent, a method of maintaining the airway (laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation), and a muscle relaxant. The effect of anaesthesia may continue after the completion of surgery and can delay discharge. Various regimens of anaesthesia have been suggested for day-procedure laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 35 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Psychology 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 38 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2014.
All research outputs
#12,652,269
of 21,035,197 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,954
of 12,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,800
of 285,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#147
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,035,197 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,782 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.