↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Postoperative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Postoperative procedures for improving fertility following pelvic reproductive surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001897.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

James M N Duffy, Neil Johnson, Gaity Ahmad, Andrew Watson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 43%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,474
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,550
of 107,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.