↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) for kidney transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005019.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suetonia C Palmer, Sankar D Navaneethan, Jonathan C Craig, Vlado Perkovic, David W Johnson, Sagar U Nigwekar, Jorgen Hegbrant, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Abstract

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have higher risks of cardiovascular disease compared to the general population. Specifically, cardiovascular deaths account most deaths in kidney transplant recipients. Statins are a potentially beneficial intervention for kidney transplant patients given their established benefits in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease in the general population. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Researcher 21 11%
Other 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 42 22%
Unknown 41 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 50 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,030,532
of 22,741,406 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,690
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,151
of 307,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,741,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.