↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravesical treatments for painful bladder syndrome/ interstitial cystitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Intravesical treatments for painful bladder syndrome/ interstitial cystitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006113.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy E Dawson, Jim Jamison

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Panama 1 <1%
Unknown 157 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Other 13 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 35 21%
Unknown 49 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 49 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,210,302
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,854
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,396
of 88,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.