↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
125 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
17 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
405 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
769 Mendeley
Title
Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007938.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip J Wiffen, Sheena Derry, Rae Frances Bell, Andrew SC Rice, Thomas Rudolf Tölle, Tudor Phillips, R Andrew Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 769 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 769 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 106 14%
Student > Bachelor 90 12%
Researcher 64 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 50 7%
Other 115 15%
Unknown 288 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 215 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 70 9%
Neuroscience 32 4%
Psychology 32 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 3%
Other 87 11%
Unknown 309 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 169. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#243,678
of 25,718,113 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#409
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,123
of 332,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 246 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,718,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 246 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.