↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical health care monitoring for people with serious mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Physical health care monitoring for people with serious mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008298.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graeme Tosh, Andrew V Clifton, Jun Xia, Margueritte M White

Abstract

Current guidance suggests that we should monitor the physical health of people with serious mental illness, and there has been a significant financial investment over recent years to provide this.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Researcher 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Psychology 22 11%
Social Sciences 13 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 52 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,408,662
of 18,195,986 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,502
of 11,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,528
of 267,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,195,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.