↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Physical health care monitoring for people with serious mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
Title
Physical health care monitoring for people with serious mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008298.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graeme Tosh, Andrew V Clifton, Jun Xia, Margueritte M White

Abstract

Current guidance suggests that we should monitor the physical health of people with serious mental illness, and there has been a significant financial investment over recent years to provide this.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Researcher 33 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 82 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 11%
Psychology 24 9%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 90 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,127,155
of 26,177,157 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,705
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,454
of 322,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,177,157 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.