↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyaluronidase for reducing perineal trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
Title
Hyaluronidase for reducing perineal trauma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010441.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fan Zhou, Xiao Dong Wang, Jing Li, Gui Qiong Huang, Bing Xin Gao

Abstract

Perineal hyaluronidase (HAase) injection was widely used to reduce the occurrence of perineal trauma, pain and need for episiotomy in the 1950s to 1960s. Reports suggested that the administration of HAase was a simple, low risk, low cost and effective way to decrease perineal trauma without adverse effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 202 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 73 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 16%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 79 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,028,007
of 26,266,588 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,198
of 13,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,584
of 325,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,266,588 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.