↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyaluronidase for reducing perineal trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Hyaluronidase for reducing perineal trauma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010441.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fan Zhou, Xiao Dong Wang, Jing Li, Gui Qiong Huang, Bing Xin Gao

Abstract

Perineal hyaluronidase (HAase) injection was widely used to reduce the occurrence of perineal trauma, pain and need for episiotomy in the 1950s to 1960s. Reports suggested that the administration of HAase was a simple, low risk, low cost and effective way to decrease perineal trauma without adverse effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 143 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 18%
Student > Master 25 17%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Social Sciences 10 7%
Psychology 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 41 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,065,202
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,434
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,380
of 239,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.