↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Hyaluronidase for reducing perineal trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Hyaluronidase for reducing perineal trauma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010441.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fan Zhou, Xiao Dong Wang, Jing Li, Gui Qiong Huang, Bing Xin Gao

Abstract

Perineal hyaluronidase (HAase) injection was widely used to reduce the occurrence of perineal trauma, pain and need for episiotomy in the 1950s to 1960s. Reports suggested that the administration of HAase was a simple, low risk, low cost and effective way to decrease perineal trauma without adverse effects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 167 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 18%
Student > Master 27 16%
Researcher 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 46 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 17%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 52 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,471,807
of 22,743,667 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,820
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,895
of 307,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#130
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,743,667 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.