The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003408.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sujanthy S Rajaram, Nayan K Desai, Ankur Kalra, Mithil Gajera, Susan K Cavanaugh, William Brampton, Duncan Young, Sheila Harvey, Kathy Rowan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 378 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 371 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 11% |
| Other | 35 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 80 | 21% |
| Unknown | 102 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 182 | 48% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 6% |
| Psychology | 9 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 9% |
| Unknown | 115 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,177,455
of 26,388,114 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,734
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,567
of 207,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#82
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,388,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.