↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Antiviral treatment for preventing postherpetic neuralgia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
46 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Antiviral treatment for preventing postherpetic neuralgia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006866.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ning Chen, Qifu Li, Jie Yang, Muke Zhou, Dong Zhou, Li He

Abstract

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a painful and refractory complication of herpes zoster. Treatments are either partially or totally ineffective for many people with PHN. Antiviral agents, used at the time of the rash, have been proposed as an intervention to prevent the development of PHN. This is the first update since the first publication of the review in 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 228 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 17%
Other 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 64 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 99 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 70 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#843,405
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,610
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,893
of 324,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.