↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
52 tweeters
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
Title
Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004260.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa A Harvey, Lucie Brosseau, Robert D Herbert

Abstract

Arthritis of the knee is a common problem causing pain and disability. If severe, knee arthritis can be surgically managed with a total knee arthroplasty. Rehabilitation following knee arthroplasty often includes continuous passive motion (CPM). CPM is applied by a machine that passively and repeatedly moves the knee through a specified range of motion (ROM). It is believed that CPM increases recovery of knee ROM and has other therapeutic benefits. However, it is not clear whether CPM is effective.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 377 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 71 19%
Student > Master 69 18%
Student > Bachelor 52 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 8%
Researcher 27 7%
Other 67 18%
Unknown 65 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 22%
Sports and Recreations 16 4%
Engineering 13 3%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 77 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#531,201
of 17,733,079 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,242
of 11,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,521
of 265,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,733,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.