| Title |
Elective birth at 37 weeks’ gestation for women with an uncomplicated twin pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003582.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jodie M Dodd, Andrea R Deussen, Rosalie M Grivell, Caroline A Crowther |
| Abstract |
The optimal timing of birth for women with an otherwise uncomplicated twin pregnancy at term is uncertain, with clinical support for both elective delivery at 37 weeks, as well as expectant management (awaiting the spontaneous onset of labour). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 204 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 20% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 13% |
| Psychology | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 66 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,837,873
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,211
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,420
of 328,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#134
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.