↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for non‐metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Interventions for non‐metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007869.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Lansbury, Jo Leonardi‐Bee, William Perkins, Timothy Goodacre, John A Tweed, Fiona J Bath‐Hextall

Abstract

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common skin cancer, and is becoming increasingly common around the world. Left untreated, it may spread to other parts of the body, and, although the risk is low, it may ultimately lead to death. Surgical excision is the first line of treatment for most skin SCCs, although other forms of treatment are also used depending upon the nature and site of the tumour and individual participant factors. A multi-professional approach is therefore required for the management of people with this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 199 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Student > Postgraduate 14 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 43 21%
Unknown 58 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Psychology 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 28 14%
Unknown 66 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,451,815
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,920
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,510
of 103,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.