↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
571 Mendeley
Title
Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003249.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hatem A Mousa, Jennifer Blum, Ghada Abou El Senoun, Haleema Shakur, Zarko Alfirevic

Abstract

Primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is one of the top five causes of maternal mortality in both developed and developing countries.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 571 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 561 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 100 18%
Student > Bachelor 97 17%
Researcher 63 11%
Student > Postgraduate 51 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 7%
Other 112 20%
Unknown 108 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 262 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 91 16%
Social Sciences 26 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 2%
Other 42 7%
Unknown 120 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,431,735
of 18,057,469 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,556
of 11,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,177
of 269,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#68
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,057,469 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.