↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

De-escalation treatment protocols for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
Title
De-escalation treatment protocols for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010271.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liam Masterson, Daniel Moualed, Ajmal Masood, Raghav C Dwivedi, Richard Benson, Jane C Sterling, Kirsty M Rhodes, Holger Sudhoff, Piyush Jani, Peter Goon

Abstract

Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas are a distinct subgroup of tumours that may have a better prognosis than traditional tobacco/alcohol-related disease. Iatrogenic complications, associated with conventional practice, are estimated to cause mortality of approximately 2% and high morbidity. As a result, clinicians are actively investigating the de-escalation of treatment protocols for disease with a proven viral aetiology.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 22 14%
Other 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 48 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,549,131
of 17,349,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,920
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,246
of 193,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,349,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.