| Title |
De-escalation treatment protocols for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010271.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam Masterson, Daniel Moualed, Ajmal Masood, Raghav C Dwivedi, Richard Benson, Jane C Sterling, Kirsty M Rhodes, Holger Sudhoff, Piyush Jani, Peter Goon |
| Abstract |
Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas are a distinct subgroup of tumours that may have a better prognosis than traditional tobacco/alcohol-related disease. Iatrogenic complications, associated with conventional practice, are estimated to cause mortality of approximately 2% and high morbidity. As a result, clinicians are actively investigating the de-escalation of treatment protocols for disease with a proven viral aetiology. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 15% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 71 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#767,321
of 24,021,239 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,537
of 12,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,707
of 345,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,021,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.