↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Non-penetrating filtration surgery versus trabeculectomy for open-angle glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007059.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohamed A Eldaly, Catey Bunce, Ola Z ElSheikha, Richard Wormald

Abstract

Glaucoma is the second commonest cause of blindness worldwide. Non-penetrating glaucoma surgeries have been developed as a safer and more acceptable surgical intervention to patients compared to conventional procedures.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 134 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Other 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Researcher 13 10%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 32 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,267,567
of 16,722,463 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,696
of 11,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,609
of 190,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#120
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,722,463 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.