↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
85 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
766 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1687 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000072.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott Reeves, Ferruccio Pelone, Reema Harrison, Joanne Goldman, Merrick Zwarenstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,687 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1687 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 245 15%
Student > Master 232 14%
Researcher 100 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 75 4%
Other 307 18%
Unknown 641 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 409 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 279 17%
Social Sciences 66 4%
Psychology 39 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 37 2%
Other 170 10%
Unknown 687 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2022.
All research outputs
#661,430
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,134
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,385
of 335,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.