The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Decompressive surgery of lower limbs for symmetrical diabetic peripheral neuropathy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006152.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Vinay Chaudhry, James Russell, Allan Belzberg |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 152 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 23 | 15% |
Researcher | 21 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
Professor | 11 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
Other | 34 | 22% |
Unknown | 41 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 44% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Unknown | 48 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#3,591,887
of 26,337,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,195
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,747
of 97,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#23
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,337,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.