↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Oral antibiotics versus parenteral antibiotics for severe pneumonia in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Oral antibiotics versus parenteral antibiotics for severe pneumonia in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004979.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Ximena Rojas‐Reyes, Claudia Granados Rugeles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 135 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 14%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 39 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 35%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 47 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,664,291
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,572
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,989
of 84,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.