↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Maternal nutrient supplementation for suspected impaired fetal growth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Maternal nutrient supplementation for suspected impaired fetal growth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2003
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000148
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lale Say, A Metin Gülmezoglu, G Justus Hofmeyr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 112 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 27 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 32 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,746,060
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,134
of 12,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,611
of 129,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.