↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Plasma volume expansion for suspected impaired fetal growth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Plasma volume expansion for suspected impaired fetal growth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 1996
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000167
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lale Say, A Metin Gülmezoglu, G Justus Hofmeyr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 77 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Other 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 32 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 31%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Psychology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 34 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,566
of 26,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.