↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Betamimetics for suspected impaired fetal growth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Betamimetics for suspected impaired fetal growth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lale Say, A Metin Gülmezoglu, G Justus Hofmeyr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 119 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 37 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 41 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,921,111
of 26,311,549 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,794
of 13,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,961
of 46,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,311,549 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.