↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Betamimetics for suspected impaired fetal growth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Betamimetics for suspected impaired fetal growth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2001
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lale Say, A Metin Gülmezoglu, G Justus Hofmeyr

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 116 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Master 13 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Other 30 25%
Unknown 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 34%
Unspecified 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 28 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,532,940
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,005
of 12,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,524
of 44,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,337 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.