↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Workplace interventions for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
41 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Workplace interventions for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003440.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Cahill, Tim Lancaster

Abstract

The workplace has potential as a setting through which large groups of people can be reached to encourage smoking cessation.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 443 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 16%
Student > Master 71 16%
Researcher 66 15%
Student > Bachelor 53 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 7%
Other 79 17%
Unknown 80 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 11%
Psychology 48 11%
Social Sciences 39 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 2%
Other 59 13%
Unknown 95 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#533,911
of 17,359,532 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,277
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,748
of 194,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#30
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,359,532 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.