↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Workplace interventions for smoking cessation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
32 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
580 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Workplace interventions for smoking cessation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003440.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Cahill, Tim Lancaster

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 570 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 12%
Researcher 68 12%
Student > Bachelor 65 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 6%
Other 99 17%
Unknown 166 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 159 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 63 11%
Psychology 55 9%
Social Sciences 39 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 2%
Other 70 12%
Unknown 183 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2024.
All research outputs
#997,909
of 26,409,992 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,838
of 13,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,283
of 235,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,409,992 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.