↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
74 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
450 Mendeley
Title
Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010152.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Eccleston, Emma Fisher, Lorraine Craig, Geoffrey B Duggan, Benjamin A Rosser, Edmund Keogh

Abstract

Chronic pain (i.e. pain lasting longer than three months) is common. Psychological therapies (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy) can help people to cope with pain, depression and disability that can occur with such pain. Treatments currently are delivered via hospital out-patient consultation (face-to-face) or more recently through the Internet. This review looks at the evidence for psychological therapies delivered via the Internet for adults with chronic pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 444 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 95 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 13%
Researcher 58 13%
Student > Bachelor 51 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 68 15%
Unknown 89 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 25%
Psychology 113 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 13%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 30 7%
Unknown 106 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#291,292
of 21,786,000 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#534
of 12,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,724
of 200,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,786,000 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.