↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
73 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
511 Mendeley
Title
Psychological therapies (Internet-delivered) for the management of chronic pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010152.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Eccleston, Emma Fisher, Lorraine Craig, Geoffrey B Duggan, Benjamin A Rosser, Edmund Keogh

Abstract

Chronic pain (i.e. pain lasting longer than three months) is common. Psychological therapies (e.g. cognitive behavioural therapy) can help people to cope with pain, depression and disability that can occur with such pain. Treatments currently are delivered via hospital out-patient consultation (face-to-face) or more recently through the Internet. This review looks at the evidence for psychological therapies delivered via the Internet for adults with chronic pain.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 511 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 505 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 98 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 13%
Researcher 63 12%
Student > Bachelor 56 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Other 74 14%
Unknown 126 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 122 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 119 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 59 12%
Social Sciences 21 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 1%
Other 35 7%
Unknown 148 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#367,871
of 24,525,534 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#648
of 12,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,157
of 226,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,525,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.