↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Heparin‐bonded catheters for prolonging the patency of central venous catheters in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Heparin‐bonded catheters for prolonging the patency of central venous catheters in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005983.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prakeshkumar S Shah, Niketa Shah

Abstract

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are a mainstay in the management of critically ill children. However, these catheters are associated with mechanical and infectious complications which reduce their life span. Heparin bonding of catheters has shown promise in animal studies and in adults. This is the first update of a review published in 2007.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
Unknown 170 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 41 24%
Unknown 45 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Psychology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 56 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,138,631
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,771
of 11,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,455
of 234,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.