↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Root canal posts for the restoration of root filled teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004623.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bolla M, Muller-Bolla M, Borg C, Lupi-Pegurier L, Laplanche O, Leforestier E, Bolla, Marc, Muller-Bolla, Michele, Borg, Cybele, Lupi-Pegurier, Laurence, Laplanche, Olivier, Leforestier, Eric

Abstract

The foundation for the reconstruction of endodontically-treated teeth can be provided by a metal or a non-metal post and core system but no guidelines exist for choosing one or the other in particular clinical cases.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Switzerland 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 103 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 21%
Student > Postgraduate 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Other 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 75%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 16 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2015.
All research outputs
#1,666,319
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,426
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,735
of 196,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.