| Title |
Rehabilitation for improving automobile driving after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008357.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stacey George, Maria Crotty, Isabelle Gelinas, Hannes Devos |
| Abstract |
Interventions to improve driving ability after stroke, including driving simulation and retraining visual skills, have limited evaluation of their effectiveness to guide policy and practice. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 10% |
| Researcher | 24 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 19% |
| Unknown | 78 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 57 | 19% |
| Psychology | 18 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 84 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,914,337
of 23,730,866 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,536
of 12,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,133
of 222,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#132
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,730,866 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.