↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Rehabilitation for improving automobile driving after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
Title
Rehabilitation for improving automobile driving after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008357.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stacey George, Maria Crotty, Isabelle Gelinas, Hannes Devos

Abstract

Interventions to improve driving ability after stroke, including driving simulation and retraining visual skills, have limited evaluation of their effectiveness to guide policy and practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 224 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 11%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 49 22%
Unknown 39 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 22%
Psychology 17 7%
Neuroscience 13 6%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 47 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,214,112
of 16,600,302 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,953
of 11,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,360
of 191,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#115
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,600,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.