The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Resection versus other treatments for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010244.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Senthil Kumar, Brian R Davidson, Giuseppe Fusai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 51 | 20% |
| Unknown | 60 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 118 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 9% |
| Unknown | 70 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2024.
All research outputs
#7,258,532
of 26,316,305 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,601
of 13,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,888
of 236,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,316,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,209 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.