↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for sensory impairment in the upper limb after stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
282 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Interventions for sensory impairment in the upper limb after stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006331.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Doyle, Sally Bennett, Susan E Fasoli, Kryss T McKenna

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 276 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 73 26%
Student > Bachelor 40 14%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 6%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 48 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 76 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 61 22%
Neuroscience 19 7%
Engineering 12 4%
Psychology 11 4%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 62 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,891,783
of 16,435,394 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,526
of 11,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,595
of 269,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#188
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,435,394 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.