| Title |
Interventions for sensory impairment in the upper limb after stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006331.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan Doyle, Sally Bennett, Susan E Fasoli, Kryss T McKenna |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 22% |
| Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 385 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 82 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 14% |
| Researcher | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 15% |
| Unknown | 102 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 7% |
| Psychology | 15 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 13% |
| Unknown | 120 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,517,868
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,269
of 12,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,155
of 85,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.