| Title |
Computer‐generated reminders delivered on paper to healthcare professionals: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001175.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chantal Arditi, Myriam Rège‐Walther, Pierre Durieux, Bernard Burnand |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 3 | 15% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Ireland | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 398 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 63 | 16% |
| Researcher | 48 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 17% |
| Unknown | 123 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 101 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 15% |
| Psychology | 22 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 55 | 14% |
| Unknown | 138 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,443,973
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,950
of 13,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,240
of 327,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#131
of 261 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 261 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.