| Title |
Nutritional support for head-injured patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001530.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pablo Perel, Toshihiko Yanagawa, Frances Bunn, Ian G Roberts, Reinhard Wentz |
| Abstract |
Head injury increases the body's metabolic responses, and therefore nutritional demands. Provision of an adequate supply of nutrients is associated with improved outcome. The best route for administering nutrition (parenterally (TPN) or enterally (EN)), and the best timing of administration (for example, early versus late) of nutrients needs to be established. |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 42 | 27% |
| Unknown | 13 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,295,786
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,780
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,632
of 67,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.