↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Community‐based interventions for the prevention of burns and scalds in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Community‐based interventions for the prevention of burns and scalds in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004335.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathy Turner, Anneliese Spinks, Roderick J McClure, Jim Nixon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Fiji 1 <1%
Unknown 160 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 39 24%
Unknown 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 9%
Psychology 11 7%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Unspecified 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 53 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,516,336
of 25,390,203 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,582
of 12,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,093
of 63,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,390,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.