↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Anticoagulants versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000187.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ritu Saxena, Peter J Koudstaal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 103 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 16%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Other 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,099
of 75,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.