↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prevention of infection in arterial reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Prevention of infection in arterial reconstruction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003073.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew Stewart, Paul S Eyers, Jonothan J Earnshaw

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 35 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 42 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,516,137
of 25,389,116 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,582
of 12,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,615
of 86,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,389,116 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.