↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with limited prior laparoscopic experience
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010478.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Myura Nagendran, Clare D Toon, Brian R Davidson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 63 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 37%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Psychology 6 3%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 68 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,402,680
of 26,160,558 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,826
of 13,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,520
of 237,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,160,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.