↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010813.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos de Bastos, Bernardine H. Stegeman, Frits R. Rosendaal, Astrid Van Hylckama Vlieg, Frans M Helmerhorst, Theo Stijnen, Olaf M Dekkers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 297 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 20%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 10%
Other 25 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 8%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 77 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 89 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 262. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#147,047
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#256
of 13,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,127
of 237,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,216 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.