↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010813.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos de Bastos, Bernardine H. Stegeman, Frits R. Rosendaal, Astrid Van Hylckama Vlieg, Frans M Helmerhorst, Theo Stijnen, Olaf M Dekkers

Abstract

Combined oral contraceptive (COC) use has been associated with venous thrombosis (VT) (i.e., deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). The VT risk has been evaluated for many estrogen doses and progestagen types contained in COC but no comprehensive comparison involving commonly used COC is available.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 131 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 233 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 21%
Student > Master 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 10%
Other 21 9%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 38 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 109 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 49 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 218. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2022.
All research outputs
#132,061
of 21,770,930 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#231
of 12,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,181
of 201,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,770,930 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.