↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010813.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos de Bastos, Bernardine H. Stegeman, Frits R. Rosendaal, Astrid Van Hylckama Vlieg, Frans M Helmerhorst, Theo Stijnen, Olaf M Dekkers

Abstract

Combined oral contraceptive (COC) use has been associated with venous thrombosis (VT) (i.e., deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). The VT risk has been evaluated for many estrogen doses and progestagen types contained in COC but no comprehensive comparison involving commonly used COC is available.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 186 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 23%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Researcher 19 10%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 16 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 26 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2021.
All research outputs
#96,338
of 17,661,905 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#185
of 11,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,050
of 195,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,661,905 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.