↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
310 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
283 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Combined oral contraceptives: venous thrombosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010813.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcos de Bastos, Bernardine H. Stegeman, Frits R. Rosendaal, Astrid Van Hylckama Vlieg, Frans M Helmerhorst, Theo Stijnen, Olaf M Dekkers

Abstract

Combined oral contraceptive (COC) use has been associated with venous thrombosis (VT) (i.e., deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). The VT risk has been evaluated for many estrogen doses and progestagen types contained in COC but no comprehensive comparison involving commonly used COC is available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 279 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 56 20%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 11%
Other 25 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 65 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 115 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 43 15%
Unknown 78 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#190,279
of 25,396,120 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#327
of 11,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,529
of 236,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,396,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.