↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
22 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
19 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
469 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006396.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Tikka, Jos H Verbeek, Erik Kateman, Thais C Morata, Wouter A Dreschler, Silvia Ferrite

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 469 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 14%
Student > Bachelor 61 13%
Researcher 46 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 7%
Other 22 5%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 178 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 14%
Psychology 16 3%
Engineering 15 3%
Environmental Science 14 3%
Other 63 13%
Unknown 190 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#755,927
of 26,176,714 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,336
of 13,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,062
of 330,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#33
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.