↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

What is this page? Embed badge

Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
476 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Facebook Wikipedia
Title
Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008797.pub2
Pubmed ID
24595586
Authors

Ying C Cheong, Grisham Smotra, Amanda C de C Williams

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain is a common and debilitating condition; its aetiology is multifactorial, involving social, psychological and biological factors. The management of chronic pelvic pain is challenging, as despite interventions involving surgery, many women remain in pain without a firm gynaecological diagnosis.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 476 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 470 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 15%
Student > Bachelor 59 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 11%
Researcher 41 9%
Other 28 6%
Other 100 21%
Unknown 126 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 178 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 11%
Psychology 33 7%
Unspecified 22 5%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Other 47 10%
Unknown 132 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,273,786
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,065
of 12,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,649
of 222,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.