↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
514 Mendeley
Title
Non‐surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008797.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying C Cheong, Grisham Smotra, Amanda C de C Williams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 514 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 508 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 74 14%
Student > Bachelor 65 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 10%
Researcher 42 8%
Other 30 6%
Other 102 20%
Unknown 148 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 189 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 11%
Psychology 36 7%
Unspecified 19 4%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 152 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,947,179
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,263
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,369
of 236,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.