↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
417 Mendeley
Title
Non-surgical interventions for the management of chronic pelvic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008797.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ying C Cheong, Grisham Smotra, Amanda C de C Williams

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain is a common and debilitating condition; its aetiology is multifactorial, involving social, psychological and biological factors. The management of chronic pelvic pain is challenging, as despite interventions involving surgery, many women remain in pain without a firm gynaecological diagnosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 417 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 409 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 14%
Student > Bachelor 57 14%
Researcher 37 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 8%
Other 94 23%
Unknown 72 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 181 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 12%
Psychology 31 7%
Social Sciences 14 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 3%
Other 48 12%
Unknown 79 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,106,079
of 17,475,439 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,782
of 11,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,689
of 194,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,475,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.