↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
139 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
Title
Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009573.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Mischke, Jos H Verbeek, Annika Saarto, Marie-Claude Lavoie, Manisha Pahwa, Sharea Ijaz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 139 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 277 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 19%
Student > Bachelor 41 14%
Other 29 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 61 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 101 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 66 23%
Engineering 9 3%
Psychology 7 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 29 10%
Unknown 69 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 109. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#254,199
of 19,368,131 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#501
of 11,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,698
of 197,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,368,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.