↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
129 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
Title
Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009573.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Mischke, Jos H Verbeek, Annika Saarto, Marie-Claude Lavoie, Manisha Pahwa, Sharea Ijaz

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 129 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 308 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 18%
Student > Bachelor 44 14%
Other 30 9%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Postgraduate 23 7%
Other 64 20%
Unknown 74 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 106 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 22%
Engineering 9 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Unspecified 6 2%
Other 36 11%
Unknown 83 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#348,465
of 23,052,509 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#619
of 12,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,262
of 221,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,052,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.