The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Gloves, extra gloves or special types of gloves for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries in healthcare personnel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009573.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christina Mischke, Jos H Verbeek, Annika Saarto, Marie‐Claude Lavoie, Manisha Pahwa, Sharea Ijaz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 17 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 14% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Finland | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Croatia | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 16% |
| Scientists | 8 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 352 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 62 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 12% |
| Other | 33 | 9% |
| Researcher | 26 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 69 | 19% |
| Unknown | 103 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 112 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 75 | 21% |
| Psychology | 9 | 2% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 10% |
| Unknown | 114 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#461,891
of 26,385,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#762
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,857
of 236,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 239 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,385,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 239 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.