↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled steroids and risk of pneumonia for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
84 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
368 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled steroids and risk of pneumonia for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010115.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayleigh M Kew, Alieksei Seniukovich

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 396 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 16%
Researcher 54 13%
Student > Bachelor 48 12%
Other 37 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 9%
Other 79 19%
Unknown 87 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 173 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Psychology 13 3%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 101 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#511,184
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#975
of 12,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,948
of 222,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.