↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled steroids and risk of pneumonia for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
124 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
330 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled steroids and risk of pneumonia for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010115.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayleigh M Kew, Alieksei Seniukovich

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 365 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 63 17%
Researcher 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 42 11%
Other 37 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 9%
Other 75 20%
Unknown 71 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 168 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 20 5%
Psychology 13 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 3%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 85 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#289,302
of 18,990,581 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#560
of 11,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,126
of 197,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,990,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.