↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Inhaled steroids and risk of pneumonia for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
85 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
391 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
Title
Inhaled steroids and risk of pneumonia for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010115.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kayleigh M Kew, Alieksei Seniukovich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 429 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 15%
Researcher 59 13%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Other 39 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 9%
Other 82 19%
Unknown 108 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 176 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Psychology 13 3%
Other 58 13%
Unknown 124 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#570,258
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#962
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,985
of 236,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.