Title |
Red cell transfusion management for patients undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd009752.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kirstin L Wilkinson, Susan J Brunskill, Carolyn Doree, Marialena Trivella, Ravi Gill, Michael F Murphy |
Abstract |
Congenital heart disease is the most commonly diagnosed neonatal congenital condition. Without surgery, only 30% to 40% of patients affected will survive to 10 years old. Mortality has fallen since the 1990s with 2006 to 2007 figures showing surgical survival at one year of 95%. Patients with congenital heart disease are potentially exposed to red cell transfusion at many points in the surgical pathway. There are a number of risks associated with red cell transfusion that may be translated into increased patient morbidity and mortality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 292 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 40 | 14% |
Researcher | 37 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 11% |
Other | 25 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 7% |
Other | 64 | 22% |
Unknown | 75 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 117 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
Psychology | 8 | 3% |
Unspecified | 5 | 2% |
Other | 27 | 9% |
Unknown | 95 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,404,726
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,080
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,920
of 307,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#178
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.