↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2017
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011109.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carisa Petris, Don Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 195 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 11%
Researcher 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 12 6%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 77 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 9%
Unspecified 9 5%
Computer Science 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 83 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,782,148
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,812
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,733
of 325,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#109
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.